Arbitration Awards May Alter the Dynamics of Labor Arbitration in the U.S. or the "Board") Chairman, William B. Gould IV, noted two decades ago that: courts have struggled with a problem endemic to American labor law.... the uneasy coexistence between public law under the ... [National Labor Relations Act (the "Act")] and privately negotiated grievance- arbitration procedures involving the interpretation of collective bargaining agreements. the pragmatic accommodation of the twin elements of American labor policy enforcement of the Act on behalf of the public by the Board, and a national policy favoring arbitration to resolve private labor disputes. The Board's December 2014 decision in Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co., 361 NLRB No. 132, 2014 NLRB LEXIS 964 (2014), which overturned its long established standard for deferring to arbitration awards, may well test and our national labor policy that favors arbitration. for Deferral to Arbitration its hand as a matter of discretion, and, pursuant to a doctrine announced in Spielberg Mfg. Co., 112 NLRB 1080 (1955), deferred to arbitration awards involving the same underlying facts as the contemporaneous unfair labor practice claims. The Board required only that the party seeking deferral show that (a) the arbitration proceedings appeared to have been fair and regular; (b) all parties agreed to be bound by the award; and that (c) the arbitrator's decision was not "clearly repugnant" to the purposes and policies of the Act. "Clearly repugnant," subsequent NLRB decisions explained, meant only that the arbitration award had to be "`palpably wrong," i.e., the decision was not susceptible to any interpretation consistent with the Act. the arbitrator had to have considered the unfair labor practice requirement, there announcing that it would be satisfied, and would defer if the contractual and statutory issues were factually parallel and the arbitrator was presented generally with the facts relevant to resolving the unfair labor practice. This standard assured deferral to the arbitration award in most cases in which it was sought. Standard, Babcock Overturns 60 Years of Precedent existing post-arbitral award deferral standard based on its belief, according to the NLRB's General Counsel (the "GC") balanced the protection of employee rights under the Act the unfair labor practice issue with the national policy of encouraging arbitration to resolve disputes he leads the firm's labor practice. He has for more than 40 years advised a broad range of national and international corporations in all aspects of employment law, with clients in the entertainment, investment and real estate development fields, as well as numerous not-for-profit organizations. 360 Lexington Avenue, 14th Floor New York, New York 10017 Fax: 212.922.9335 ganfershore.com |