abatement and a year of reduced rent agreeable to allow the tenant to continue operating and producing cash flow for the center. The parties shake hands on the deal and the landlord gives the tenant free rent for four months and then begins accepting lower rent. After a year, the tenant returns and tells the landlord that it still is having cash flow problems and simply cannot start paying full rent and an additional amortized payment to repay the reduced/unpaid amounts as well. In the meantime, landlord is halfway through negotiations to expand the center and that this tenant pay off all of the past due amounts immediately and start paying full rent or the loan will not be approved. The landlord demands the tenant honor its agreement. The tenant refuses and says its lawyer has advised that the landlord has "waived" the requirement of payment of the full contract rent and the payment of past due amounts. When the landlord reiterates its demand, the tenant responds that it has no other choice but to shut its doors in two months. Could this situation have been prevented? Maybe and maybe not... The common law and/or statutes in most states provide that long term acceptance a party can result in a legal waiver or estoppel preventing the party from enforcing the original terms of the lease. In extreme cases, this can also result in a permanent change to such terms for the remainder of the term. However, in many states, courts have upheld the right of commercial parties to enforce anti- waiver provisions that would preserve the original contract terms at the end of the abatement/reduced rent period. So, how could the landlord protect itself in the situation described above? Measures address all of the problems that arose in this example, but here are a few thoughts on what the parties could have done: as robust remedies for tenant default; of agreement into a written lease amendment, including a clear recitation that the original contract terms will remain in full force and effect; insure performance including one or more of the following: a) cross- corporate or personal guaranties; b) perfected security interest in favor of the landlord in tenant's trade fixtures, equipment, accounts etc; and c) letter of credit for the total amount of free and reduced rent plus any past due amounts as of the time of the agreement. during the abatement/reduced rent period. The first indication that the tenant is not back on track should not be an email from the tenant in response to a demand for proper performance. |