background image
44
T H E P R I M E R U S P A R A D I G M | C e l e b r a t i n g 2 5 y e a r s w i t h t h e w o r l d ' s f i n e s t l a w f i r m s
Metadata in Civil Litigation:
An Australian Perspective
The Telecommunications Interception
and Access Act 1979 (Cth) (TIAA),
as amended in 2015, requires that
Australian telecommunication companies
retain specific data for a period of at
least two years. The purpose of the TIAA
is to permit access to retained data by
Australian law enforcement and security
agencies to assist in national security and
serious criminal investigations. According
to the Australian government's 2014/15
annual report on the TIAA, enforcement
agencies made 365,728 authorizations for
access to historical telecommunications
data in that financial year, of which the
overwhelming majority was related to
enforcement of criminal law.
1
While it is not uncommon for a
party in civil proceedings to request a
subpoena to compel a service provider
(SP) to produce documents relating to
telephone or internet communications,
amendments to the TIAA due to come
into effect in April 2017 will restrict
access of data by subpoena where that
data was retained by a SP to solely
comply with the TIAA, provided no
exclusion applies.
The Federal Attorney-General's
Department has recently invited
submissions to widen the application
of the TIAA to allow access to retained
data in civil litigation.
2
The Australian
government's reasons for this expansion
are not immediately apparent as, apart
from copyright rights holders, there
appears to be limited support for the
proposal when weighed against the
compromise to personal privacy.
Currently under consideration by
the Government is the Parliamentary
Committee on Intelligence and Security's
recommendation that the TIAA include
the ability for regulations to be made
which exclude the new restriction
for certain classes of matters. The
Committee mentioned examples such
as family law proceedings, including
violence or international child abduction
cases, but did not propose an exhaustive
list of classes.
What Data is Retained under
the TIAA?
Retained data under the TIAA includes
information such as:
(a) a person's name, address, contact
information and device details;
(b) the source and destination of a
communication including a phone
number, email address or IP address;
(c) the duration and time of a
communication or a session of data
transfer; and
(d) the geographical location where the
communication took place.
Access to Retained Data for
Civil Litigation
Despite not including the content of
a communication, such as the data
transfer or web history, the retained
data is by no means minimal and its
significance to civil litigation ought not
be underestimated. Such data may, and
often can, substantially assist a litigant to
prove elements of their case, and would
have wide application in matters where,
for example, defamation or breach of
copyright is alleged.
Dallas Buyers Club LLC
Litigation
One example which highlights the
significance of retained data is the
case of Dallas Buyers Club.
3
In this
case, Dallas Buyers Club LLC made
an application to obtain preliminary
discovery of the identifying information
of 4,726 IP address
4
holders who
allegedly downloaded and shared the
2013 movie Dallas Buyers Club via
Asia Pacific ­ Australia
Murray Thornhill leads the business and
government division of HHG Legal Group.
Since 2003, Murray has developed and led
HHG's success in construction law, insolvency,
employment, trusts and estate litigation and
corporate/commercial dispute resolution,
including in relation to cross-border disputes.
Murray has a particular interest in private
international law and jurisdiction disputes.
Jordan Hurley is a lawyer at HHG Legal Group.
Jordan has worked with the firm since 2014
and has been admitted to the Supreme Court of
Western Australia.
HHG Legal Group
Level 1, 16 Parliament Place
West Perth, Western Australia 6005
Australia
+61 8 9322 1966 Phone
murray.thornhill@hhg.com.au
jordan.hurley@hhg.com.au
hhg.com.au
Murray Thornhill
Jordan Hurley